Are electromagnetic fields making Oshawa man sick?

03/19/2012

0 Comments

 
By Jayme Poisson

EMF, electrRuss Loader has a twisted neck, mangled hands, swollen ankles and sores on his legs. He’s convinced that invisible electromagnetic fields in his Oshawa apartment are making him sick.

But Health Canada, the agency that sets the guidelines for exposure to such fields reviewed a report on the Loader’s apartment and says there’s nothing to be alarmed about.


Add Comment
 

Residents Claim Dirty Electricity Making Them Sick

02/28/2012

0 Comments

 
SOUTH REDONDO BEACH (CBS) — A group of SoCal mothers believe electricity is making their families sick.

CBS2’s Paul Magers spoke with these residents to find out why they think nearby power lines and their neighborhood substation is creating unsafe living conditions.

“This is my hair loss from one shower,” said Lori Barber, a resident in South Redondo Beach.


Add Comment
 

Government Pulls A Fast Move

06/27/2011

0 Comments

 
In collaboration with the International EMF Alliance (IEMFA), scientists from Europe, North America, Australia and Israel have sent an Open Letter to Dr. Christopher Wild, Director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), calling for a postponement of the forthcoming meeting May 24-31, 2011 in Lyon, France, “Non-Ionizing Radiation, Part II: Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field [includes mobile telephones],” at which determination of the carcinogenicity of cell phones and wireless technologies will be made.

The “Open Letter to the International Agency for Research on Cancer” http://iemfa.org/images/pdf/OpenLetter_IARC.pdf signed by international scientists and public officials asserts:

  1. No decision should be made by IARC on the carcinogenicity of radiofrequency radiation (RF/MW) until the Interphone Study’s remaining results are disclosed. To date, only the pooled 13-country data for glioma and meningioma elements have been published. Though the Interphone Study data was collected by 2004, the overall analysis of the risk of acoustic neuroma, parotid gland tumors and tumors in the regions of the brain most highly exposed to cellphone radiation has yet to be published. Also, single-country Interphone studies have not yet been fully published for Australian, Canada, Finland, Italy and New Zealand. However, other individual country studies published show very significant risks for acoustic neuroma, parotid gland tumor and glioma.
International scientists say scientific conclusions will only be possible when all of the country results, and all of the overall pooled results, are fully published.

  1. Telecom Industry Observers at the IARC Meeting Places a “Chilling Effect” on Grant Dependent Researchers, and Should Be Excluded. The presence of observers such as Joe Elder, representing the Mobile Manufactures Forum (previously a long-term Motorola Employee); Jack Rowley, representing the GSM Association (a previously long-term Telstra employee); and Mays Swicord representing the Cellular Telecommunication Industry Association (previously a long-term Motorola employee), create an environment of scientific intimidation and suppression through the presence of these influential corporate interests.
A paper on the unsuitability of Professor Anders Ahlbom of the Karolinksa Institute in Sweden to Chair the IARC expert group on epidemiology which will judge on the carcinogenicity of RF/MW has been separately been issued by France’s Priartem and can be found at www.Priartem.fr This report claims Professor Ahlbom has extreme conflicts of interest and intellectual bias favoring the telecommunications industry, and calls for Ahlbom’s to be replaced.

  1. IARC’s Required Conflict-of-Interest Statements Should Be Made Public. Scientists say IARC, which calls itself ‘transparent’, must release the conflict-of-interest statements, as do scientific journals, but IARC Officer, Dr. Robert Baan, who will head the upcoming IARC meeting, has refused to release the IARC expert’s conflict of interest statements, claiming they are confidential. It is inappropriate, and lacking in transparency, for a publically funded organization, in this case funded with approximately 38 million Euros, to hide its conflicts-of-interests statements from public view.
A recently published paper by International EMF Alliance Co-founder, Don Maisch, PhD, of Australia, greatly elaborates on the conflicts of interest at WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). See “Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)—The Problem of Conflict of Interest & Commercial Influence in WHO Agencies and the Need for Public Interest Representation”, found at http://www.iemfa.org/index.php/publications/news

L. Lloyd Morgan, B.S., brain tumor analyst and lead author of the landmark paper “Cellphones and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern—Science, Spin and the Truth Behind Interphone” http://electromagnetichealth.org/electromagnetic-health-blog/cellphones-cause-brain-tumors-says-new-report-by-international-emf-collaborative , says, “Leading international scientists fear the telecom-influenced IARC, in the upcoming meeting in Lyon, can not be impartial because grant giving industry executives are Observers and much of IARC’s own 2004 data still remains inxplicably unpublished. If a decision is railroaded through in this scenario, indicating that RF/MW does not cause cancer, this would be a great disservice to public health globally and a sad day for science, as there is overhwhelming evidence to the contrary. There is evidence of risk of many cancers from long-term use of cell phones, including gliomas (braincancer), acoustic neuromas (tumors of the acoustic nerve), meningiomas (tumors of the brain lining), salivary gland tumors, eye cancers, testicular cancers and leukemia.”

Alasdair Philips, of Powerwatch UK says, “Letters from many scientists have been sent to Dr. Christopher Wild, Director of IARC, protesting the meeting that will judge on the carcinogenicity of RF/MW, criticizing IARC for holding such a meeting 1) without full disclosure of the remaining 50% of the Interphone study results, six years after publication; 2) without disclosure of the expert group on epidemiology’s conflicts-of-interest statements, and 3) with the heavy presence of powerful telecom industry Observers at the meeting. Thus far, Dr. Wild has not responded to the many complaints received from global scientists demanding greater disclosure, accountability and transparency on this important matter. Without these essential ingredients, science looses all integrity.”

Conflicts of interest at IARC are not new. In 2005, the Editor of the Lancet Oncology, David Collingridge, submitted a paper on lack of transparency, “What does IARC have to loose?” http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2803%2901086-6/fulltext. A transparency issue also exists in the current IARC decision-making process, where the database of scientific studies being considered, and studies submitted by global scientists for consideration, have not been made public, rendering the greater scientific community unable to evaluate the science being considered.

After partial results of the 13-country Interphone study were finally published in May 2010, Dr. Elizabeth Cardis, lead author of the Interphone study, and Siegal Sadetzki, who led the Israeli part of the study, separately subsequently published commentary on brain tumor risks from cell phones in The Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, urging caution http://electromagnetichealth.org/category/electromagnetic-health-blog . They said, “While more studies are needed, indications of an increased risk (of gliomas - a particularly dangerous form of brain tumour) in high and long-term users from Interphone and other studies are of concern...Even a small risk at the individual level could eventually result in a considerable number of tumours and become an important public-health issue.”

Alex Swinkels, Co-founder of IEMFA, says, “It is clear from recent protests over the upcoming IARC meeting on RF/MW, and the earlier effort by Dr. Cardis and Sadetzki to clarify the risks in the Interphone study not previously emphasized by the Interphone Working Group’s official statement, that scientists are increasingly not tolerating deceptions in science and commercial interests influencing regulatory bodies.”

IEMFA suggests it would behoove public health and government officials, as well as media, to listen carefully to non-commercially connected LIFE scientists and analysts expressing concern about biological effects of radiofrequency and microwave radiation, and to support the global movement underway toward greater transparency and integrity in science with consequences for public health.”

Add Comment
 

Why does walking barefoot on earth make you feel better? By Dr. Mercola

06/18/2011

0 Comments

 
Picture
    Credit: JoshB

    By Dr. Mercola

    Do you notice you feel better when you walk barefoot on the Earth?

    Recent research has explained why this happens. Your immune system functions optimally when your body has an adequate supply of electrons, which are easily and naturally obtained by barefoot contact with the Earth. Research indicates that electrons from the Earth have antioxidant effects that can protect your body from inflammation and its many well-documented health consequences.

    For most of our evolutionary history, humans have had continuous contact with the Earth. It is only recently that substances such as asphalt, wood, rugs, and plastics have separated us from this contact.

    It is known that the Earth maintains a negative electrical potential on its surface. When you are in direct contact with the ground (walking, sitting, or laying down on the earth’s surface) the earth’s electrons are conducted to your body, bringing it to the same electrical potential as the earth. Living in direct contact with the earth grounds your body, inducing favorable physiological and electrophysiological changes that promote optimum health.

    There is an emerging science documenting how conductive contact with the Earth, which has is also known as Earthing or grounding, is highly beneficial to your health and completely safe.  Earthing appears to minimize the consequences of exposure to potentially disruptive fields like “electromagnetic pollution” or “dirty electricity.”

    Some of the recent evidence supporting this approach involves multiple studies documenting Earthing’s improvement in blood viscosity, heart rate variability, inflammation, cortisol dynamics, sleep, autonomic nervous system (ANS) balance, and reduced effects of stress.

    The Ultimate Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Grounding or Earthing is defined as placing one’s bare feet on the ground whether it be dirt, grass, sand or concrete (especially when humid or wet). When you ground to the electron-enriched earth, an improved balance of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system occurs.

    The Earth is a natural source of electrons and subtle electrical fields, which are essential for proper functioning of our immune systems, circulation, synchronization of biorhythms and other physiological processes and may actually be the most effective, essential, least expensive, and easiest to attain antioxidant.

    Modern science has thoroughly documented the connection between inflammation and all of the chronic diseases, including the diseases of aging and the aging process itself. It is important to understand that inflammation is a condition that can be reduced or prevented by grounding your body to the Earth the way virtually all of your ancestors have done for hundreds if not thousands of generations.

    How the Modern Running Shoe Maybe Destroying Your Health Materials such as metals are electrical conductors. They contain free or mobile electrons that can carry electrical energy from place to place.

    Your body is somewhat conductive because it contains a large number of charged ions (called electrolytes) dissolved in water. Your blood and other body fluids are therefore good conductors. Free or mobile electrons can also move about within your body

    Other materials, called insulators, have very few free or mobile electrons. Plastic and rubber are good insulators and are used to cover electrical wires to keep the conductors from touching each other and from touching your skin, which could otherwise give you a shock.

    Traditionally shoes were made of leather, which actually conducts electrons and therefore maintains a conductive contact between the Earth and your feet. However modern day rubber and plastics are electrical insulators and therefore block the beneficial flow of electrons from the Earth to your body.

    How the Different Types of Electricity Impact Grounding There are three different forms of electricity:

    1. Direct current (DC) electricity
    2. Alternating current (AC) electricity, and
    3. Static electricity
    All of these forms of electricity are present in the environment and can affect the way you feel.

    Direct Current, consider an ordinary flashlight with two type D batteries. When the light is switched on, a current created by chemical reactions in the batteries causes electrons to flow to the bulb, which converts the electrical energy into light. The electric field travels to the bulb virtually instantaneously, while the electrons move slowly – about three inches per hour.

    Alternating Current or AC is the type of electricity that is delivered to homes and

    businesses. Alternating current is produced by electric generators and is distributed throughout a community via wires that are overhead or buried under the ground.

    In contrast to direct current electricity, the actual flow of electrons in an alternating current circuit is virtually zero, as the electrons mainly go back and forth (60 times per second in North America and 50 times in Europe) without actually progressing along the wire. Therefore, for an AC current in a typical lamp cord, the electrons do not actually “flow.” Instead they vibrate back and forth by a distance of about a hundred-thousandth of an inch.

    This means that the electrons in your household wiring are probably the same ones present when your house was built.  In contrast to direct current, the electrons excited by a generator do not flow to your home and then return to the generator after delivering energy to your lights or appliances. The electrical energy flows at about the speed of light; the electrons only vibrate back and forth.

    This point is important because of confusion about the subject from statements such as this: “Every time an electron leaves a power plant to create electricity for our homes, schools and offices it must return to create more electricity – fundamental law of physics.”7

    This statement is completely incorrect.

    There is absolutely no fundamental law of physics that requires the electron sent out from an alternating current generator to return to the generator to create more electricity.

    It has also been asserted that power companies have begun using the Earth as one part of the alternating current circuit to save on the expense of wire needed to meet increasing demands for electricity. Again, this statement is completely inaccurate and misleading. It is a statement that leads some to believe that walking barefoot or using grounding devices will connect people to the electrical distribution system and thereby electrify their bodies with alternating current electricity.

    In fact, the U.S. National Electrical Code does not permit connecting an electrical system directly to the Earth. In other words the Earth does not to carry a return current back to the generator. Instead electrical systems are grounded to protect from lightening and other extraordinary events.

    How Your Home Electrical Connections Can Zap Your Health The wiring in homes and buildings and the power distribution system acts as an antenna that can transmit and receive both natural and man-made electromagnetic fields. Many technologies add significantly to our electromagnetic environment: cell phone towers, Wi-Fi, wireless routers, satellite TV and cordless telephones. And a variety of devices introduce spikes or transients that distort the 60 cycle electric field in the wiring, particularly when appliances are switched on or off.

    Here are some common examples:

    Ballasts used in fluorescent lighting High-efficiency lighting such as CFL (Compact-Fluorescent) bulbs Computer hard drives Electric heaters Hair dryers Refrigerators and air conditioners Vacuum cleaners To illustrate this phenomenon, we will use the example of your neighbor’s refrigerator or air conditioner switching on or off. This produces a sudden electrical “spike” that travels

    through the power lines to your household electrical system. A signal is also radiated into the atmosphere because the wiring acts as an antenna.

    Taken together the various signals and distortions to the alternating current field create what some people refer to as “dirty electricity.” Attempts have been made to link these phenomena to a variety of health effects. There has been considerable debate about this issue.

    Some people appear to be very sensitive to electromagnetic fields and can become sick from exposure to them, whereas others are not sensitive. Some have advocated the use of filters to remove the so-called “dirty electricity” flowing through home wiring. The problem is that alternating electric fields are present everywhere in the environment – they are radiated from wires, even when no current is flowing through them.

    It is therefore impossible for a filter to prevent exposure to electrical fields and the noise produced by appliances, as described above.

    In a 2010 review, Frank De Vocht of the University of Manchester’s Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health in the UK found only seven published studies supporting the claim that dirty electricity is a biologically active component of standard electromagnetic pollution.  Each study had significant methodological flaws in its experimental design, assessment of exposure, and statistical analysis. De Vocht concluded that the flaws in the studies prevented a valid assessment of any causal links between exposure and adverse effects.10 Moreover, a few studies suggesting health benefits for using the filters were uncontrolled experiments involving only a few subjects.

    You Can Actually Measure How Grounding Yourself Reduces Your Voltage A Body Voltage Meter can determine how much electricity is being induced on you when you are lying in bed or sitting in a chair, and how much the electric charge is reduced by grounding.



    A meter of this kind is shown above. A number of inexpensive meters like this are available from Radio Shack and other sources. One of the terminals of the meter is touched with your finger, while the other terminal connects to a wire (Earthing wire) that connects to a rod in the Earth or to a good ground in the electrical system. It is important that the body voltage meter have the capability to measure the AC electrical potential between your skin and the surface of the Earth.



    Just because an electrical outlet has a third plug does not necessarily mean that it was properly installed. The only way to know for certain would be to check it. The device shown here, called a circuit checker, can determine if the grounding terminal of an electrical outlet is properly grounded and can therefore be used with personal grounding systems or with the Body Voltage Meter described above.

    The cord going to the lamp next to your bed is radiating an alternating electric field even when the lamp is turned off. Research has shown that walking barefoot on the Earth or connecting to the Earth with an Earthing system actually stabilizes the internal electrical milieu of your body and is therefore beneficial.

    Until large-scale studies and mechanistic investigations are completed, many scientists and many electric utilities have suggested that those who use electrical appliances practice “prudent avoidance” meaning that they should minimize their exposure to sources of electric power until the scientific evidence is more definitive.

    In the context of “prudent avoidance,” some proponents of Earthing systems have emphasized the fact that Earthing greatly reduces your exposure to fields from electrical wiring, using evidence provided by the body voltage meter as shown above. While this is probably correct, reducing exposure to power frequency fields (including dirty electromagnetic fields) is definitely not the most important consequence of Earthing. Far more significant for health is the ability of Earthing systems to deliver antioxidant electrons that stabilize the operation of the immune system and other physiological processes in the body.

    The Health Benefits of Grounding The most important health consequence of Earthing is providing  your body abundant electrons from the Earth. The scientific research and hypotheses related to Earthing point to a major impact on the inflammatory process as a result of this electron transfer.

    Your body has evolved a means to kill bacteria using reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are delivered to a site of injury by white blood cells. Although very effective at this task, ROS are also very reactive biochemically and can damage healthy tissues. ROS are usually positively charged molecules that need to be neutralized immediately to prevent them from diffusing into healthy tissues.

    That is one of the major reasons why your body needs an abundant supply of negative charges. Food based antioxidants like astaxanthin are helpful but a regular supply of electrons from the earth can supply them as well.

    Nature has solved this problem by providing conductive systems within your body that deliver electrons from your feet to all parts of your body. This has been the natural arrangement throughout most of human history. Negative charges have always been available, thanks to the Earth, to prevent the inflammatory process from damaging healthy tissues.

    All of this changed when we began to wear shoes with rubber and plastic soles, and no longer slept in direct contact with the Earth. A variety of measures of physiological stress show that the person who is grounded is less stressed and more relaxed. These measures demonstrate a shift from sympathetic to parasympathetic activation, reduction in muscle tension, and increased heart rate variability.

    Regardless whether or not grounding reduces exposure to environmental fields, these studies firmly demonstrate that Earthing does not stress the body; in fact, Earthing reduces every measure of stress used in studies.

    Concerns about Earthing When I first became aware of Earthing in 2005 I was initially fascinated with the concept. But after reviewing it with some of my mentors in energy medicine there was a concern that Earthing may actually increase your exposure to so-called “electromagnetic pollution” or “dirty electricity.”

    However, more careful analysis revealed that Earthing actually decreases your exposure to these potentially disruptive fields. To understand why this is so, it is crucial to look at the basic biophysics of electricity and magnetism.

    Most of the confusion about this topic is due in part to the fact that research on Earthing the human body is opening up new perspectives, and requires a fresh examination of the basics of electricity and magnetism as applied to physiology and medicine. Another source of confusion arises from a belief that the unnatural frequencies referred to as “electromagnetic pollution” and “dirty electricity” flow through the wiring of homes and can be removed with filters. The reality is that these signals are present virtually everywhere in our environment as electromagnetic radiations, and cannot be completely removed with filters in the wiring.

    Earthing actually decreases your exposure to these potentially disruptive electromagnetic fields, but we again emphasize that this is not the most important effect of Earthing

    Grounding May Be the Missing Link to Getting Healthy Earthing may be one of the most important overlooked factors in public health. When grounding is restored, many people report significant improvement in a wide range of ailments, including chronic fatigue.

    These changes are rapid and often occur within 30 minutes.

    To date all of the individuals who reported that they had inflammatory issues have benefited from Earthing. This includes people with various severe autoimmune diseases. Note that we do not assert that Earthing is a “treatment” or a “cure” for any disease or disorder. Instead, it can be said without any equivocation that the human body evolved in contact with the Earth and needs to maintain this natural contact in order to function properly.

    When you provide your body a constant source of free electrons, through diet or grounding you help to radically reduce inflammation which is widely acknowledged as one of the primary factors contributing to premature aging and chronic disease.

    Add Comment
     

    The cancer survivor allergic to modern life: Mother is so sensitive to electric gadgets she has to live by candlelight By Andy Dolan Last updated at 5:47 PM on 18th May 2011

    06/01/2011

    0 Comments

     
    • Condition is so severe her neighbors can't even have Wi-Fi
    • Problems began after chemotherapy for bowel cancer

    She cannot watch television, listen to the radio or boil the kettle to make a cup of tea.


    So severe is Janice Tunnicliffe’s sensitivity to electricity that even her neighbors have had to stop using wireless internet.

    The mother-of-two spends her evenings playing board games by candlelight, avoiding switching on lights or using fridges, freezers, computers and mobile phones.

    Mood lighting: Janice and her husband Carl use candles at night as she says electromagnetic fields give her chest pains

    Mrs Tunnicliffe, 55, claims a course of chemotherapy during treatment for  cancer left her with a rare condition called electrosensitivity, which causes severe reactions to the electromagnetic fields given off by electrical appliances.

    In the three years since she developed the illness, Mrs Tunnicliffe has suffered headaches, chest pains, nausea and tingling in her arms and legs whenever she is close to any device that emits electromagnetic fields.

    Janice Tunnicliffe's husband Carl spent £500 on the Transformer 28 to block electromagnetic signals but it has failed to alleviate her condition

    Her only relief came when a power cut struck her village of Wellow, Nottinghamshire. The windows of her three-bedroom cottage are shielded by metallic insulation to deflect electromagnetic waves, and she spends weekends camping in the countryside with husband Carl, 43, to give her a ‘complete break’ from electrical signals.

    She said: ‘Wi-Fi makes me feel like I have a clamp at the back of my head which is squeezing the life out of me.

    ‘It’s completely draining and a home hub can totally immobilise me – I’m left unable to move my arms and legs.’  

    Mrs Tunnicliffe, a former accounts manager in the cosmetics industry, moved to the countryside from Nottingham after divorcing her first husband ten years ago. She said her allergy developed three years ago following treatment for bowel cancer.

    At the time, Carl, a contracts manager, had just bought a photocopier, and the couple had installed their first wi-fi router.

    Janice Tunnicliffe uses an electromagnetic field detector. She says modern technology makes her ill following chemotherapy

    Mrs Tunnicliffe said she noticed how much better she would feel when walking in the countryside, then quickly deteriorate again upon returning home.

    Bunker: Janice has covered bedroom windows in layers of foil in an attempt to make herself feel better

    She also felt fine during a fortnight’s holiday in Greece, only for her symptoms to come back on her return.

    The couple became aware of electrosensitivity, or ES, when Carl began researching her symptoms on the internet.

    Gradually, the couple removed electrical items such as their wi-fi hub, microwave, toaster and kettle from their home in an attempt to reduce her symptoms.

    Mrs Tunnicliffe said she has learned to manage the condition by herself after she was shown little sympathy by her GP, and was refused NHS funding for treatment at a private hospital which specializes in electro- sensitivity.

    While authorities in countries such as Sweden and Switzerland recognize the condition, the UK Health Protection Agency says scientific tests have failed to establish a link between radio waves and ill health. Many doctors believe the condition could be psychosomatic.

    Graham Lamburn, from Powerwatch, an organization which researches the effects of electromagnetic fields, said 3 to 4 per cent of the population report some susceptibility to ES, but few suffer to such a degree.

    He added: ‘This kind of case is rare, but certainly there have been some people who have had to give up their houses and jobs because of ES.

    ‘With wireless internet and mobile phones, we’ve got something here that no one really knows about and no one has considered it might be a problem.’


    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1387972/Woman-allergic-electricity-Cancer-survivor-sensitive-gadgets-lives-candlelight.html#ixzz1NQK0aiiT
    Add Comment